Difference between revisions of "User talk:An evil sheep"

From Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(Re: See Also?)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Anyway:
 
Anyway:
*Changing the footer template you broke all the pages using it (and every page currently use it): you fixed some of them, but the rest of the pages (they were a lot!) were broken.
+
*Changing the footer template you broke all the pages using it (and currently every command/sysvar page use it): you fixed some of them, but the rest of the pages (they were a lot!) were broken.
 
*You changed the template to cross link to other commands, but this is redundant cause you just have to click on the related category in the footer to have all the related comands listed.
 
*You changed the template to cross link to other commands, but this is redundant cause you just have to click on the related category in the footer to have all the related comands listed.
 
*The footer template was introduced to avoid to update all the cross-links every time a new command is introduced (before it was so and the template was introduced by Kedrik Valorite).
 
*The footer template was introduced to avoid to update all the cross-links every time a new command is introduced (before it was so and the template was introduced by Kedrik Valorite).

Latest revision as of 09:38, 19 September 2005

Re: See Also?

I've reverted your changes for several reasons (some of them are explained here: Template talk:Footer).


Anyway:

  • Changing the footer template you broke all the pages using it (and currently every command/sysvar page use it): you fixed some of them, but the rest of the pages (they were a lot!) were broken.
  • You changed the template to cross link to other commands, but this is redundant cause you just have to click on the related category in the footer to have all the related comands listed.
  • The footer template was introduced to avoid to update all the cross-links every time a new command is introduced (before it was so and the template was introduced by Kedrik Valorite).

Hope you did not get offended. :)


--Boydon 09:37, 19 Sep 2005 (PDT)