Difference between revisions of "Talk:Documentation"
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
namespaces for commands and sysvars? | namespaces for commands and sysvars? | ||
+ | |||
+ | e.g <nowiki>[[Commands:str]] and [[SysVars:str]]</nowiki> | ||
+ | |||
--[[User:Kedrick Valorite|Kedrick Valorite]] 19:49, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT) | --[[User:Kedrick Valorite|Kedrick Valorite]] 19:49, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:03, 6 August 2005
There's still the problem that you may have several entries resulting in the same wiki link.
"namespace variables" could mean the variables in general or the two #nsname and #nstype variables. Or the str(ing) command and the #str(ength) variable.
One way to deal with this would be to use other names, e.g. varstr. Alternatively, one could also simply host all entries on a single page and make subsections for each meaning. Then you could link to them using e.g. Str#Variable and Str#Command.
-- Cheffe 18:33, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
I'm assuming then that you can't preface a page name with a # somehow?
tests:
# #true
& #x0023; & #x0023;true
(without the space between & and #)
--Kedrick Valorite 18:59, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
No, you simply can't make pages that are named #something. You can hide the real links by using piped links.
E.g. [[Help:Sandbox|BlaBla]] = BlaBla
-- Cheffe 19:21, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
humm...
namespaces for commands and sysvars?
e.g [[Commands:str]] and [[SysVars:str]]
--Kedrick Valorite 19:49, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)
FYI: as a convention, I used an arrow for 'read only' variables and planned on using a double arrow for read/write variables (within the sysVar page itself)
good, bad, indifferent?
→
↔
→
↔
--Kedrick Valorite 19:59, 6 Aug 2005 (PDT)